Will Nations Fight Bitcoin With A Competing PoW Network?

In a discussion about X, Jason Lowry discussed the feasibility and future of reusable workback networks (RPOW)-especially whether countries may try to create competing systems for work. The conversation arose through an investigation from the investor of Hole Rabbit (@rabbitholeinvst) directed to Lowry, an astronaut engineer, pioneer in the American space force, and the author of “Softwar”. Lori's thesis emphasizes the strategic importance of Bitcoin for American national security.

Can the national state fight Bitcoin with their prisoners ’network?

“Do you see a future in which another guide is created on work networks for other applications?” Rabbit Hole Investor Lowry asked. Lori answered by referring to the questions he previously received from the White House Science and Technology Office.

he I mentioned Although he cannot definitely predict the future, he believes that there will be a dominant RPOW network that acquires global acceptance in the same way that TCP/IP has become the global standard for data transfer: “This was one of the questions I received from the Science and Technology Office policy in The White House. TCP/IP Global Protocol to Transfer Data (…) in RPOT

He explained how RPOW is firmly firm with arithmetic energy and power expenses, creating a “promotion cycle” that naturally stimulates participants to deport to the largest and safer network. Lori pointed to what he calls “maintenance of a mutual guarantee”, as even aggressive national countries (for example, NATO and Brexes) will become “Fremies” on the same RPOW network. According to his evaluation: “The cost of attacking both sides increases to the extent that they become” engines “, each of which enhances the safety of the other's interests on the same network.”

Lori's position tends strongly towards Bitcoin like a dominant RPOW. Although he does not describe himself “Maximalist Bitcoin”, it shows that Bitcoin is the actual global POW standard due to market powers and network effects.

Thomas Young, the administrative partner of Rumjog Enterrises, has investigated the Lori thesis by asking about individual bitcoin ownership and the possibility of BTC liquefy in a world in which nation -states dealt with as the “standard”: “Will it be practical for individuals to own them in particular hold BTC?. Specifically, will the “rent” of countries interested in BTC do worse or created? Diversification or they simply want to own their BTC?

Lori replied: “I am a belief that if Bitcoin becomes a global mathematical unit, its purchasing power will increase naturally with the growth of humanity more productive. This makes the need to chase the return that is outdated – unnecessary, even. Bitcoin itself is the return.”

Then he participated in a warning perspective about the promises of the return in the future, as governments can build executive orders to seize BTC CUSTOLAL. According to Lowry: “If you are a head or thorny nation, I will attract people to give up the BTC self -body through the expression of the return promise … Then, with simple executive order, I will nationalize NYDIG, Coinbase and Mstr's Bitcoin … For this reason I don't have Mstr . Eo6102 Next, it will be widely supported.

Another user asked Lori whether sovereign entities may create their own networks – for example, for example, Sidechains or Drivechains associated with the main Bitcoin network – under its sovereign control. Lori answered through the prisoners ’contrast and prove a share (POS) in terms of centralization:“ If the goal is the sovereign control over the network, then POS is a much better design than the captive of the distinguished symbols, distributing them to itself, and implementing the voting -based sale system .. .

And he admitted that the nation can create a CIA RPOW network, but this approach is more complicated and less efficient compared to the system of direct rise to achieve central governance: “POS provides a more direct and practical way to achieve central control over the digital asset network without arithmetic and intense energy requirements From POW.

The comprehensive topic of Lowry's comment is that the theoretical pressures of the game-whether between individuals or national countries-are preferred to unify the one POD network is safer. He argues that the absolute bitcoin scale and its firm position give it almost negative progress. Meanwhile, the countries that seek to control alternative protocols may try, but they eventually face a strongly slope battle competing against what has already been adopted by the “free and open market”.

At the time of the press, BTC was traded at $ 95,937.

Distinctive image created with Dall.e, Chart from TradingView.com